I used the generic #PersonOfInterest display, but we all know @TrustedNerd is a #HostileActor. So, I fixed it to reflect he's doing bad, bad, bad things and is a threat to society.
The pic is of him swinging a cane in commission of an Assault, with a red targeting box to indicate that we're focusing in on this very mad, very fat, very dangerous, person of interest.
The @TrustedNerd left us a voicemail on Friday night... Something about "you're gonna pay the price," and then a further clarification that the price is "gonna be pretty fucking ugly.. expect a bloodbath."
You're a little fuckin' piece of shit, I just wanna tell you that.
And.. you know something? You're gonna fuckin' pay the price,
I can guarantee you, that you're gonna fuckin' pay the price.
That's gonna be pretty fucking ugly. Instead of..
expect a bloodbath, you piece of shit. —Jessica Jonathan Yaniv, PhD (2020Mar27 2129PDT)
We just got confirmation from Vicki Fullerton, Manager of Registry Operations at Surrey Provincial Court that they are aware of the scheduling conflict that has Yaniv scheduled to appear in two different courts at the same time on Monday March 16, 2020.
Ms Fullerton would neither confirm nor deny that this was done in order to discourage public participation in the vexatious StarChamber of Dr J. Jonathan Yaniv.
This story will be updated as we acquire more information.
CSO/SUR/PC/85518 | It looks like in the commotion, SUR-PC-85518 (Yaniv v Physio Table) was recently updated (on Mon Feb 24), with a Scheduling Adjustment to be Apr 17 at 1030PDT.
And in other news, it looks like Yaniv filed a 125± page Nothing Burger at the Surrey Registry on 2019Oct11.
Indexed as: JJY v. Hot Mess Salon (No. 2), 2020 BCHRT 42
IN THE MATTER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE, RSBC 1996, c. 210 (as amended)
AND IN THE MATTER of a complaint before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
BETWEEN COMPLAINANT JJY
AND RESPONDENT HOT MESS SALON
In the past two decades, several dozen scientific papers published in both German- and English-speaking countries have been devoted to vexatious litigants, querulous paranoia and unreasonable complainants.
The second part of this paper examines the history of querulous paranoia and vexatious litigation in the English-speaking countries from the nineteenth century to today: this article suggests that the lack of deep-reaching research on querulous paranoia in these countries is due to a broad cultural, legal and medical context which have caused unreasonable complainants to be considered a purely legal, rather than a medical issue.
The enclosed is an article we posted to the KiwiFarms under one of our avatars, in response to a continuing question about the nature of Vexatious Transgender Therapist J. Jonathan Yaniv, PhD.
No sooner had we posted it, than our account was terminated and the article unpublished. It looks like the Gay Mafia may have infiltrated the Farms...
This update courtesy of Proletariat Mook. The Jan13 matter was adjourned to 2020Feb10. This is convenient, as Dr Yaniv seems insistent on kicking the can down to road.. even as Dr Yaniv continues to demonstrate aggressive behaviour that would demonstrate the need for a custodial sentence.
After all is said and done, it turns out that CSO-SUR-P-A-237804 has been stayed by BCProsecution, and CSO-SUR-P-A-237805 is scheduled for a hearing of its merits on Feb 3rd at 1400PST in Surrey Provincial Court #310.
Here's a short clip from Roadkill Radio providing an update from someone who isn't afraid to get her hands dirty.
That is very convenient. Hypothetically, it allows for the collation of exculpatory evidence that proves the malicious nature of the prosecution Crown started at the behest of Yaniv, possibly with falsified/distorted information. As demonstrated in Drainville v. Vilchez it is possible in extreme case (extreme like a predator potato) for damages to be awarded in a malicious prosecution case where the defendant wasn’t the police or the Crown, but a private individual. Wherein the informant acted malicuiously and in bad faith, and a malicious prosecution suit is being brought against a private individual.
Although, Adrian Picard seems a bit detached. I think he's retained by Legal Aid, or a state-provided attorney.
SUR-PA-237538 — The most recent victim of Dr Yaniv's vexatious litigation (Dec30 process application, Yaniv v Smith) is due in the Surrey Provincial Courts on 2020Jan29 at 0930PST.
This is for a release on bail.. Crown really shat the bed with this one, making an idiot of itself by being Yaniv's mule, and thoroughly calling the fair and equitable administration of justice into question.
